Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Ontario Gouge Meters

Every once and a while I like to gripe about things in my home province. Well, mainly I gripe about how empty the think-tank of the current Ontario government is. Really, they make their own ammunition.

 
This time my gripe is about how greedy they are. And first before I start my rant I do want to say that I don't mind paying for services. Sometimes some are valuable. But when I'm getting taxed and the people that are supposed to handle the money properly but don't (like having a Minister of Finance that doesn't have any accounting experience), I get a little ticked.  A good example is the Ontario Liberal party giving themselves raises but wanting to freeze the pay rates for the rest of the public sector. See? Not very bright.

 
Anyways, here's why I'm griping:

 
About a month ago I sat through a "Stay Cool" presentation. The idea's good; tips to stay cool in the summers since degree days over 30 C increase every year. It's a health hazard. It makes it uncomfortable when I have to go outside to smoke. There's been many reported deaths due to heat stroke and one stat that stuck out was that the poor die because they can't afford air conditioning. Me, being the forward thinker believe that air conditioners should eventually become a necessity, like heaters in the winter, instead of a creature comfort since the sun isn't shrinking anytime soon.

 
Anyways, what does our current government implement? "Smart" Readers. Meaning that you pay more for hydro at certain times of the day, mainly when the sun is out in the summer and all day in the winter. This helps the poor immensely. Especially with HST.  When the provincial government says “smart” - think the opposite; just like when they call themselves Liberal - think the opposite.

 
For a country that basically dodged the recession, Ontario should be the richest province but these guys couldn't organise a piss in a brewery with their financial and decision making skills.
 
Flipping through the Province’s Smart Meter Q & A, I didn't find anything positive about this scam. They didn't even bother to try and sugar coat anything. It was basically "We're dicks so deal with it". If there's any kind of benefit, it's usually preceded by a "could", "can", "may", “might" or "possibly" That sounds about right since the Liberals don't know too much of anything.

 
It starts off with:

 
“Between now and 2025, Ontario will replace about 80 per cent of its electricity system. There are several ways to do that:
  1. building new generating facilities,
  2. refurbishing current facilities (where that makes economic sense), and
  3. investing in conservation and energy management tools so that we require less new electricity generating capacity. “
Here’s a brilliant idea: How about the Ontario Government stops giving every County 2 – 4 million dollars in grants for a new hockey arena and put it towards the above. Then rates wouldn’t have to go up. Maybe I’m too smart for the Provincial Liberals.

 
“Q. How will smart meters help?

 
A. Smart meters – plus time-of-use-rates – will provide you with a cost management tool. Smart metering can also help Ontario build an efficient, cost-effective and more environmentally sound electricity sysem (typo):

 
•Smart metering can help reduce the total electricity capacity we need now, and the amount of new capacity we need to build for the future. Smart meters provide you with a clear incentive to shift consumption away from the daily peaks. “

 
Incentive? Where the hell's the incentive again? Incentives are good things. I didn't find that anywhere on the Q & A.

 
“ •Smart metering can help Ontario to reduce its environmental footprint. By reducing our peak demand, we'll reduce our use of the less environmentally attractive resources that are called on when demand is high. “

 
They should focus more on solar instead of ripping people off that implemented it already. They did a 27-per-cent cut in the subsidy paid out to farmers and small businesses for producing solar energy because "of the unexpected popularity of ground-mounted solar projects."

 
“•A smart meter system will open up the opportunity for new kinds of conservation and demand management programs in the future. In the future smart meters could allow the introduction of different time-based incentive programs, or the opportunity for you to control your energy use through energy management devices or smart appliances. “

 
I love the "could". "Could" doesn't mean anything. I “could” grow another 3 arms next week.

 
I found this to be my favourite:

 
"Q. Why would I want a smart meter? What are the benefits of smart meters for me?

 
A. Here are three of the major new benefits that you'll see as soon as time-of-use rates are in effect:

 
  1. 1.You'll be able to take new actions to manage your energy bill. With a smart meter and time-of-use rates, you'll be able to take advantage of two cost-cutting strategies. These include:
    Reducing your electricity use across the higher cost (on-peak and mid-peak) periods; and
    Shifting your electricity use to lower cost (off-peak) periods.
  2. You'll get rapid feedback about your electricity consumption. Your information about your electricity use will be available to you the next day via the Internet and/or by telephone. Plus your electricity bills will provide a summary of your consumption during each TOU rate period over the previous billing period.
  3. Your electricity bills will reflect the readings taken and by your smart meter over the previous period. That means your bills will always be as up-to-date as possible."
It would have been easier to say, "Well, there's not really any benefit at all." Good thing they're not trying to implement readers that waste time like the above answer did.

 
The Q/A that burned my ass the most was:

 
“Q. Will my electrical bill go up?

 
A. That will depend, in part, on you. Once you are billed on a time-of-use basis, depending how and when you use electricity, you may pay a bit more or less or see very little difference. With Smart Meters, those who work to conserve and shift their usage to off-peak, weekends or holidays may benefit the most. Currently those customers see no price advantage no matter what time of the day they use power. “

 
A simple Yes would have sufficed. That was followed by the insulting:

 
“Q. TOU sounds complicated.

 
A. It's true that, at first, you'll need to be more aware of how and when you use energy, but over time, it will simply become a habit. Smart metering will give you better information and a tool to help you make informed decisions about your electrical usage. Once you review this information, you'll be able to develop the best strategies for you.”

 
"It'll simply become habit"? What the fuck kind of answer is that? That's the thinking of the Government of Ontario.

 
So instead of penalizing people that run their air conditioners after it's hot and wasting energy, you pay more when you have to use them.  I guess it'll be cheaper to leave my computer lights on all night

 
So there's my rant. It'll get warmer, no one can afford to pay for electricity, a bunch of deaths. Pretty cool. Kind of makes me want to move. Next they'll say that Natural Gas is a good alternative. My alternative would be to have the province hire an actual accountant and not have a smug useless lawyer bastard leading the party. There's a thought.
 
And remember, Stay Cool.

 

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Ask and Ye Shall Receive...kind of

I always get ticked off when I hear anti-smokers rattle off bullshit. This time the bullshit was brought to me by the Ontario Government.

Here's what happened: A friend at mine at my day job jokingly sent me an e-mail about the government's blurb on some tobacco tax (like it's not high enough; in reality, it is gouging), and how increases are always about "protecting children" or some other feel-good reason. Anyways, some of the "Fast Facts" on this website seemed a little fishy, since most of these things are.

I enquired about a "fact"; actually here's what I wrote: "I'd love to hear where the "$5.8 billion in productivity losses each year" comes from, especially when there isn't a definition for "productivity losses"."

So for that, I got back: "The information contained in the "Did You Know?" section on the Strengthening a Smoke-Free Ontario page was provided by the Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion. Specifically, the reference to productivity losses can be found in a report titled, Evidence to Guide Action: Comprehensive Tobacco Control in Ontario. Please see the bottom of report page 14 (or PDF page 26)."

Welp, right there, I turned off. I was hoping I'd be wrong but I wasn't.  How much more biased can you be when you don't have an independent study? Three independent studies usually work for me but when something anti-smoking comes from the Ontario Agency of Protection and Promotion, I'm not going to get an honest answer.

Anyways, I went to page 26. First off I glazed over when I saw mention of Third Hand Smoke at the top of the page. There's no such thing as third hand smoke and there never will be so why even print it? Look at that, bullshit where I didn't even look for it.

I think this was the paragraph that I was directed to: "In addition to these health care expenditures for diseases related to tobacco, there are indirect but very real costs. These are the costs of productivity lost due to increased sick days and the early death of adults who are employed or work at home. The economic value of this lost labour was $4.4 billion in 2002. The 2009 equivalent was $5.8 billion"

OK. Anyone see a few glaring problems? Me too.

We'll start with "indirect". Other than padding numbers, what's the use "indirect" data?

Increased sick days was a funny one because last I looked, most places don't pay you if you call in sick. So really, no one's losing money except for the person that calls in. Now if certain work places have paid sick days, they don't pay you for being sick, you don't get deducted for not being there. It's called a salary. I think if it's a sunny day, golf would probably be the greatest loss of productivity in the work place. Actually, it would be Nice Weather that would be the greatest loss of productivity. I won't even go into going to work and jerking around for 9 hours. Wait, I just did.

The "early death" is an interesting one. If someone is dead, and I'm going to go out on a limb here, they're probably not on payroll. Plus, that dead person's replacement will probably start at a lower wage than their predecessor. The magic number for productivity loss that got pulled out of the air was $4.4 billion.

I did an inflation check, which is 3% per year. So, in 2002 it was $4.4; 2003 would be $4.5; 2004 would be $4.6; 2005 would be $4.8; 2006 would be $4.9 or $5.0 if you like to round; 2007 would be $5.1; 2008 $5.2 or $5.3 if you like to round and; 2009 should be $5.4. Excel doesn't lie. Anyways, there's a billion and a half dollars that got lost somewhere along the way. I'm sure no one's going to own up to that though.
So, in the end, this was a good/bad sort of thing. The good part was they actually got back to me. I'm genuinely surprised about that. The bad part is what they sent me - a bunch of fluff. I didn't read the rest of the report yet. I'm sure there'll be another Blog entry about that.

As to why am I anti-anti-smoking, well, the obvious, I smoke but for the most part, I don't like Anti people, including anti-smokers. Being Anti is more of a controlling personality trait. I can't stand Anti people, mostly because they're not likable and are usually rain clouds that only discuss their anti-issues at any given chance. They're not fun at parties either. I'm Anti-Anti; two negatives do make a positive.

One thing before I go; this stood out: "Tobacco-related disease accounted for 10% of hospital days in 2002, more than the days for alcohol and illegal drugs combined" It's good that, really, alcohol and illegal drugs came in so low (both are "drugs", but here, they're "combined"). But if only 10% is tobacco related, then what's the other 90%, besides drugs and alcohol?

Here's the pdf in case anyone cares: http://www.oahpp.ca/services/documents/evidence-to-guide-action/Evidence%20to%20Guide%20Action%20-%20CTC%20in%20Ontario%20SFO-SAC%202010E.pdf