Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Get To Woik

Public servants ordered to work in-office 4 days a week starting in July

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/public-servants-ordered-to-work-in-office-4-days-a-week-starting-in-july/ar-AA1VLwY5?ocid=BingHp01&cvid=a57c0a5845574936df0a80c0d27dda31&cvpid=284d471806044243d13f1d14aa2403e3&ei=23

OTTAWA - The federal government is ordering public servants to be in the office at least four days a week starting this summer, with executives expected to return to the office full time in May.

A Treasury Board message to deputy department heads published Thursday said executives will have to work on-site five days per week starting May 4. All other employees must be in the office four days a week as of July 6.

The directive applies to public servants working in the core departments and agencies under Treasury Board, though the government said other federal agencies, which would include the Canada Revenue Agency and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, are "strongly encouraged" to take a similar approach.

Remote work rules have been an ongoing issue in the public service since COVID-19 forced most federal workers to work remotely in 2020. After public health restrictions began to ease, the federal government moved in 2023 to have workers return to the office two to three days a week.

The current rule, in place since September 2024, requires public servants to work a minimum of three days a week in-office, with executives in office four days per week.

Now we're all supposed to be impressed that public servants have to come in 4 days a week? 

I still can't believe "work from home" is still a thing.  There hasn't been an "emergency" from the plandemic for over 2 years and there's still lazy asses that don't want to do come in and do their job. 

It said the government will engage with unions to implement the plan, with discussions to focus on issues like assigned seating and occupational health and safety.

The message also said Public Services and Procurement Canada will work closely with departments to ensure there is enough office space for all employees.

Hang on a second, why isn't there going to be room?  Was there was a big hiring spree when WFH started?  If that's true, why was there a hiring binge?  The employees that were coming in every day before should have been able to all their work from home, no?  I've heard the "I'm way more productive at home" lie more times than I care to remember.  Or was there a big building sell-off, thinking that this is the “new normal”?  That was pretty myopic.

The gauge for me is, if you're on the Sunshine List (it's an Ontario thing; if you make more than $100,000 a year, your name and wage are published on the Sunshine List for everyone to see), you should be in the office 5 days a week.  Try and argue against it.  Most of the time, the people that say they're more productive at home either don't get along with the other employees or think they're a little too important.
 

Canadian Federal Employee, circa 2026

Sean O’Reilly, president of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada, told The Canadian Press he finds the government's decision "insulting and disrespectful."

"I would like to say I was surprised but I'm not," said O'Reilly, who was made aware of the move less than an hour before the message went out to employees. "I'm really beside myself on just why the decision is being made now."

Sean's right, this decision should have been made years ago.

Sounds like Sean doesn't want to go back into the office every day.  I think it's insulting that public servants think they're entitled not to do a 5 day work week.  You can't really serve the public if you're hiding at home during business hours.  Another rule of thumb I came up with: if you can do your job from home, someone else can do that same job for cheaper.

"I don't know how this helps the Government of Canada. It doesn't save them money. This doesn't increase productivity," he said. "I don't see how this helps my members or how it helps the Canadian people."

Sean, you were probably quoted while you were "working from home" or a Zoom call where you got to wear pajama bottoms.  I don't see how what you just said helps your cause.  You just made it sound like the people that are hired are useless whether they're in or out of the office.  If bringing back these people to the office doesn't increase productivity, fire the work-from-home dead weight and hire some contentious people.  It's pretty simple.

Nathan Prier, president of the Canadian Association of Professional Employees, said the announcement demonstrates that the government has "both a willful disregard for reality and absolute contempt for its employees and taxpayers."

"As thousands of public servants are watching their jobs disappear and Canadians are watching health and other programs get gutted, this government is committing to making public servants less productive while wasting billions of dollars of taxpayer money," Prier said. "If workers needed another sign that this government can’t be trusted, this is it.”

While that's true the current government can't be trusted and/or expected to do anything right, Nathan's arguments don't make any sense.  Wasting billions of taxpayer dollars would be keeping on people that don't want to work.  I'm a taxpayer and because of my current day job, I know exactly what WFH people are like.  I'm not thrilled that Sheila gets paid a good buck to do her laundry, prep for dinner and binge watch Netflix in the background while she's supposed to be "working from home".  That's called a waste of money, or for you savvy, business-minded people, it's called a poor ROI.

I found the "willful disregard for reality" a bit ironic.  The reality is there's no need to work from home any more.  There's no "emergency" and there's no valid excuse why there's still work from home.

The union said the decision comes on the heels of a recent ruling by the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board that telework can be negotiated at the bargaining table.

Well, that was a foolish ruling to make.  They should have thought ahead.

Sharon DeSousa, national president of the Public Service Alliance of Canada, said the four-day in-office mandate announced by the federal government is "a slap in the face" to all federal public service workers.

Well, Sharon, to the public, it's a slap in the face that it's not 5 days.  Sharon seems to have that "willful disregard for reality" that Nathan was talking about. 

"Prime Minister Carney has made it clear where his priorities lie, and they aren’t with workers," DeSousa said.

Sharon, we all knew that before the election.  He's too self-centred to care about other people and/or do a good job.  His "deal" with China is a perfect example of that.  But that doesn't matter, everyone should have been back to 5 days a week years ago.  Let go of the past and stop having that willful disregard for reality.  That goes for you too, Nathan and Sean.  Grow up and get back to work.

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

Blood Sugar Barbie Magik

"Mattel is aiming to expand on inclusivity by introducing a new Barbie with Type 1 diabetes."
https://globalnews.ca/news/11281590/barbie-type-1-diabetes-mattel/

I've never understood the need to identify with anything.  Like those yo-yos that whine about wanting to see themselves represented in the movies.  Why?  When I go to see, let's say a James Bond movie (any one but that last one, No Time To Watch), I want to see someone competent enough to overthrow the villain and save the day.  That ain't me in real life.  And I certainly wouldn't pay to go see a movie about a guy who has barely any skills and gets winded when he turns his head left or right.

I think this is what Diabetes Barbie is about.  Problem is, there's nothing to celebrate about a 7 year old with diabetes.  Hell, that shouldn't be promoted as being OK in the slightest.  Between you and me, I'm pretty happy I don't have the need to identify as someone with TD1.

The new Barbie wears a continuous glucose monitor on her arm, which is a device used to track blood sugar levels. She is also holding a phone displaying an accompanying app for the CGM and has an insulin pump attached to her waist.

Sounds like a fun toy.

Other than the Krista Berger (senior vice-president of Barbie and global head of dolls), I'm not sure who else would buy this.  There's no real stats I can find for people under 10 with Type 1 Diabetes on StatsCan so that's good news.  At least most little girls who get this as a gift will ask why Barbie has a walkman attached to her belt.

The doll carries a blue purse that can be used to hold other essential supplies or snacks on the go. Her fashion choice is also notable — she sports a blue polka dot style, which is a nod to the global symbols for diabetes awareness.

 

A purse full of candies, I hope.  And you could probably hide your weed in there too.  Are blue polka dots the symbols for diabetes awareness?  If so, why?  And where’s Barbie’s blond hair?

More questions than answers here.

Emily Mazreku, director of marketing strategy at Breakthrough T1D, added that “visibility matters for everyone facing Type 1 diabetes."

Two things: one, if I saw any person walking down the street, I wouldn't be able to tell if they have Type 1 diabetes or a headache... or anything.  The visibility angle doesn't make any sense.  Second: I don't know if Emily knows this, but Barbie could never get real T1 diabetes because she doesn't have a pancreas.  So, like a Barbie, this is empty and all for show.  But you know, Inclusivity.

"And as a mother who lives with Type 1 diabetes, Mazreku added, “it means everything to have Barbie helping the world see T1D and the incredible people who live with it.”

Now I see.  It's really for and about Emily.  How self-centred, errr... I mean, incredible of her.  And here I thought dolls were for kids.  I guess that's what happens when you lead the marketing 'strategy" department.  You just come up with bullshit to justify your job until the next contract.  Maybe the next doll will be Marketing and Strategy Barbie.  I wonder if it'll look like Emily?

Lila (Supermodel Kate Moss’s daughter), 22, has been very open about her diabetes diagnosis and shared her excitement for the launch of the new doll.

“Honoured to have a one-of-a kind Type 1 diabetic Barbie version of me to celebrate the launch of the first T1D Barbie,” she wrote on Instagram."

Again, diabetes isn't something to be proud of.  I've never seen any "Congratulations on your Diabetes" greeting cards in the Hallmark section.  It's not an accomplishment but if there's one way to trivialize a disease, it's Diabetes Barbie.  So, no, poor kids, if your Mom isn't famous or doesn't work at a marketing department, you will never get your own Barbie, even if you have Type 2 diabetes.

In short, if you're over 10 and playing with Barbies, maybe there's another underlying disability going on and if you design a doll based around yourself, you're as shallow as it gets.  Lastly, statistically, more men than women get diabetes but if you're a man playing with Barbies, chances are your name is already on the sex offender registry list.

You know what's better than a truck load of Diabetes Barbies?  Not having diabetes.

Monday, April 7, 2025

An April Fool's Gush

Tragically Hip song pulled from Carney ad, not clear why
https://torontosun.com/news/national/federal_elections/warmington-tragically-hip-song-pulled-from-carney-ad-not-clear-why

The Tragically Hip always annoyed me, just like author Joe Warmington's gushing.  You'll see.

I do want to back it up a bit by saying I played in a Tragically Hip tribute band back in the mid 90s.  And hand on heart, we sounded better them.  Not only did we play the songs better, we had the best singer in town singing the songs better.  The other guys in the band liked the Tragically Hip though.  Not me.  Growing up, I got spoiled listening to Detroit radio and these guys always came across flat.  Maybe they're considered Heavy Metal up in Ottawa.  Who knows?  Ottawa's lame like that.

There was just no mistaking that amazing sound or that incredible singer.

Even if was just for split second, for a couple of days, the voice and spirit of iconic Canadian Gord Downie and the amazing riffs of The Tragically Hip was on the federal campaign trail.

It was so great to hear these iconic Canadian artists back In View again.

But then, just like that like the legendary frontman, The Hip was gone — mysteriously vanishing as fast they showed up in the first place.

A video posted to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s X account with the opening bars of the 2006 hit, In View, showed the Liberal leader in a white hard hat festooned with a Canadian flag at a housing announcement, under the headline: “It’s time to build.”

It was an effective commercial with the up-tempo beat of the Hip song that ended with Downie’s voice only singing one word:  “I.”  But there was no mistaking that voice.

Why did they tease us like that? I wanted to hear more Gord. Wait a minute. That was brilliant. As they say, leave them wanting more.

Could this intro be anymore beta?

Let's set the record straight, they are not iconic Canadian artists.  Maybe it's me getting tired of the misuse of the word "iconic" these days when the more appropriate word to use is "popular".  And only one of group has a name you can remember: the guy from REM.

I'm not going to do a political angle on this, even though two wrongs don't make a right ("Liberals" circa 2025 and the Tragically Hip), this is about how immature and unprofessional a "news" article can read.  OK, I'll do one quick political slant: I voted Liberal in the 90s, back when they were slightly left of centre.  Now, they're just a bunch of glib low IQers that are really bad at their jobs, which ended up making things worse for everyone.  If this was the States, you could liken your current day Liberals to shifty NeoCons.

So I get the nostalgic spin, trying to tie the good times of the 90s with when the Liberals were in power.  But it's not the same party anymore and even the Tragically Hip tribute band I was in, we stopped learning their songs by 2000 since they were just putting out dud after dud.  I've never heard In View and I probably never will but I'll bet it's not as cool as Rock Candy.

But yeah, the cringemeter on this article is off the charts.  I'm assuming Joe is at least in his 40s so why does he sound like a 12 year old girl?  

There are so many Hip songs a campaign may be temped to use — from 50 Mission Cap to 38 Years to New Orleans in Sinking and, of course, the perfectly titled for an election race song, Ahead by a Century.

How's that, or any of those songs mentioned, fit in with an election race?  From what I remember (I had to listen to the lyrics for cues), 50 Mission Cap was about the Maple Leafs, 38 Years Old was about someone who shouldn't have been in jail and now, I don't remember what New Orleans Is Sinking is about but I used to do a talkbox solo in the middle of it.  I'm not sure how a song about New Orleans relates to a Canadian Election but whatever.  Do you what the most ideal election race song is?  Joe Walsh's Vote For Me.  It's all about elections.

No question, however, it would have been a heck of a get if Carney was able to bring The Hip on board to endorse the campaign. He has already had support from other celebrities like Blue Rodeo, The Edmonton Oilers and, of course, Mike Myers.

I'll take People Who Will Do Anything For Money for $400, Alex.  Not really the strongest stable of endorsers.  With Bills C-11 and C-18 now law, I can't understand why any band or musician would be endorsing current-day Liberals.  Me, personally, I'd rather have Wayne Gretzky, Bobby Orr and Don Cherry in my corner than any of the Oilers.

In View has such a great intro and if it only made an appearance and was pulled on April Fool’s Day, it was sure good to see Downie and the Tragically Hip Get Back Again into the news.

Joe single-handedly put the Tragically Hip in the news with his child-like article.  Other than that, I would still assume that the Tragically Hip weren't doing anything but putting out re-releases.  I wonder if Joe knows the singer died a few of years ago.