Monday, June 8, 2026

Pink Cataract

Ritchie Blackmore once said, "I don't understand what people see in Bruce Springsteen".  I totally agree with that.

Bruce's songs, including his ramblings and trademark I'm-in-the-middle-of-squeezing-out-a-shit vocals, always put me off.  He's not the rebel he thinks he is or wants to be.  Rebels usually want to fight the power, not join it.

But that's OK, his Power To The People festival with "Foo Fighters, Dave Matthews, Brittany Howard and Joan Baez will headline a star-studded protest festival set for the Washington, D.C., area a month before the midterm elections" should do the trick for some that like that lineup.

"The one-day, two-stage Power to the People festival is set for Oct. 3 at Merriweather Post Pavilion in Columbia, Maryland, and is being billed as about "freedom, justice, equality and rock ’n’ roll.”"

Boring.  I may not be young as I used to be but sex, drugs and rock and roll is way more fun.

"Springsteen and Rage Against the Machine guitarist Tom Morello announced the festival Wednesday while performing together at Nationals Park in Washington as Springsteen winds down his Land of Hope and Dreams American tour.

"At the concert Wednesday, Springsteen played many of his most political songs, including “American Skin (41 Shots)” about a fatal police shooting and “Streets of Minneapolis,” in response to the killings of RenĂ©e Good and Alex Pretti by federal immigration agents. “The Gestapo tactics of this president and this administration will not stand here,” Springsteen said."  Tom Morello let his guitar do the talking and said, "Beeeep, bop bop, booop, ding dong, wheeeee".

Nothing sucks the joy out of anything like a political music festival... except political songs and the people that come up with them.  Of the billions of topics to write songs about, no one can come up with anything better than politics?  How empty.

Bruce Springteen's latest release
 
Others on this list include Dropkick Murphys, Jack Black, Serj Tankian, Killer Mike, Taylor Momsen and the Linda Lindas, among others.  Other than phony metalist Jack Black, I have no idea who these other people are.

"Springsteen has long criticized President Donald Trump, who in turn has called for a boycott of Springsteen’s shows, calling him a “total loser who spews hate.”"

You may not like Trump, but that was an awesome thing to say.

"“Our democracy, our constitution, our rule of law are being challenged right now as never before by a reckless, racist, incompetent, treasonous president and his ship of fools administration,” said Springsteen."

Don't come to Canada or you'll have a super shit-fit.  Hell, we don't even have a democracy anymore.

“This American tragedy can only be stopped by the American people: you. There is no one coming to save us. We’ve got to do it ourselves,” he said. “So join us and let’s fight for the America that we love. Do you hear me, Washington?”

Bruce, what are you waiting for?  Don't be a pussy.  Put down that guitar and fight.  I'd rather hear you do that than me accidentally hearing Thunder Road again.

Goddamn, I hate that song.

Sunday, April 19, 2026

Trash My House - Please

If you live in Toronto, I already feel sorry for you.  But FIFA, (Football Is Fixed Association) is coming to town, along with, unfortunately, FIFA fans from all over the globe.  Where are these losers going to stay?  AI masters Deloitte recommends they stay at your house.

Canadian homeowners could earn thousands during World Cup matches. Here's how
Story by Chris Knight
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/topstories/canadian-homeowners-could-earn-thousands-during-world-cup-matches-here-s-how/ar-AA1X8IV0?ocid=BingHp01&cvid=c27f4dc8312843b1ee7999171f02771f&ei=52

"A report from global professional services firm Deloitte has outlined how much money homeowners in Toronto and Vancouver stand to make by renting out their properties during the upcoming FIFA World Cup. The bottom line: Torontonians could bring in an average of $2,700 by renting out their space during tournament games, while Vancouverites stand to make $4,200."

For $219 a night (that's Deloitte's average from somewhere), you can rent your house out to piece-of-shit renters for two weeks.  What a deal!  I'm not a fan of renters because they don't take care of their stuff.  And if they can't take care of their own stuff, they're certainly not going to look out for yours.  Unless they're looking out for something to steal.

That's just renters in general.  Add to that that these renters don't live in the country and they also think World Cup is interesting... these aren't the people you want in your house.

I wouldn't go to Vancouver either.  Most BC residents forget the B in BC stands for British, yet are happy when their human rights tribunal goes after comedians.  Currently, BC is just an awful, expensive place to be.

Rare photo of a fair FIFA match

Deloitte is pretty disgusting even bringing this idea up but that's Deloitte being Deloitte.  When they were Deloitte and Touche, we used to call them Toilet and Douche.  Seemed to fit.  And they have their own troubles with:

-AI-Generated Report Errors (2025): Deloitte Australia admitted to using generative AI (Azure OpenAI GPT-4o) in a $440,000 government report on welfare compliance systems.  The report contained fabricated academic citations, false court quotes, and non-existent references.  After scrutiny by academics, the firm agreed to a partial refund and issued a corrected version.  The incident sparked global concern over AI use in professional services; 
- Canadian Report Controversy (2025): A $1.6 million health care report for Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, was found to contain four fake citations, including fabricated research.  Deloitte Canada stated it did not use AI to write the report, but used it selectively to support citations.  The province has requested a full review of the report’s references, and the firm stands by its findings; 
- Exam Fraud (2025): Deloitte, along with PwC and EY, was fined $8.5 million by the U.S. PCAOB for widespread exam cheating across its Netherlands-based firms.  Over five years, hundreds of professionals, including partners, shared answers on mandatory training exams, undermining professional integrity; 
- In 2024, it was fined $20 million by U.S. regulators for allowing a client to audit itself.  In 2023, it admitted to misusing government information in Australia and faced a Senate inquiry.;
- In 2021, it was sued over failing to detect financial irregularities at Hin Leong Trading, a Singapore-based oil trader. 
- Tax Loophole Involvement (2024): Deloitte was linked to a $2.4 billion tax avoidance scheme for Liberty Global, with U.S. authorities suggesting the firm helped design the offshore maneuver known as “Project Soy.” The firm denies involvement but has faced criticism for its role in aggressive tax planning. 
Consultancy firm Deloitte confirms breach of confidential or proprietary government information on nine additional occasions last financial year, down from 18 a year earlier.

AI is handy sometimes.  I wouldn't say Deloitte has the best track record for a company that offers risk advisory services.

"Vancouver numbers are even higher. The report estimates some 204,000 tourists will visit Vancouver and surrounding areas, including 32,000 Airbnb gusts spending an average of 213,000 guest nights."

I love the if-you-don't-act-now-you're-missing-out nothing stat of 213,000 guest nights.  World Cup, thankfully, won't last 30,000 weeks.  But no matter how long it does go on for, FIFA already knows who the winner will be.

So what could go wrong?  In British Columbia, since May 2024, short-term rentals must be the host’s principal residence or a secondary suite on the same property.  Hosts must register annually with the provincial registry, display their registration number on listings, and platforms like Airbnb must remove unregistered listings. Fines for non-compliance range from $500 to $10,000 per day.  That is, if the Cowichans don't take your house first.  In Ontario, cities like Toronto and Ottawa require registration and limit rentals to primary residences.

Let's say I decided to get on board with this lucrative gravy train, where would I stay in while someone else trashes my place?  I doubt I'd be staying at a hotel since those were booked months ago.  But if you're willing to "take the money and run" with this scam, you deserve all the wrecked/stolen heirlooms in your house... if you have four walls to come back to.  

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Get To Woik

Public servants ordered to work in-office 4 days a week starting in July

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/public-servants-ordered-to-work-in-office-4-days-a-week-starting-in-july/ar-AA1VLwY5?ocid=BingHp01&cvid=a57c0a5845574936df0a80c0d27dda31&cvpid=284d471806044243d13f1d14aa2403e3&ei=23

OTTAWA - The federal government is ordering public servants to be in the office at least four days a week starting this summer, with executives expected to return to the office full time in May.

A Treasury Board message to deputy department heads published Thursday said executives will have to work on-site five days per week starting May 4. All other employees must be in the office four days a week as of July 6.

The directive applies to public servants working in the core departments and agencies under Treasury Board, though the government said other federal agencies, which would include the Canada Revenue Agency and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, are "strongly encouraged" to take a similar approach.

Remote work rules have been an ongoing issue in the public service since COVID-19 forced most federal workers to work remotely in 2020. After public health restrictions began to ease, the federal government moved in 2023 to have workers return to the office two to three days a week.

The current rule, in place since September 2024, requires public servants to work a minimum of three days a week in-office, with executives in office four days per week.

Now we're all supposed to be impressed that public servants have to come in 4 days a week? 

I still can't believe "work from home" is still a thing.  There hasn't been an "emergency" from the plandemic for over 2 years and there's still lazy asses that don't want to do come in and do their job. 

It said the government will engage with unions to implement the plan, with discussions to focus on issues like assigned seating and occupational health and safety.

The message also said Public Services and Procurement Canada will work closely with departments to ensure there is enough office space for all employees.

Hang on a second, why isn't there going to be room?  Was there was a big hiring spree when WFH started?  If that's true, why was there a hiring binge?  The employees that were coming in every day before should have been able to all their work from home, no?  I've heard the "I'm way more productive at home" lie more times than I care to remember.  Or was there a big building sell-off, thinking that this is the “new normal”?  That was pretty myopic.

The gauge for me is, if you're on the Sunshine List (it's an Ontario thing; if you make more than $100,000 a year, your name and wage are published on the Sunshine List for everyone to see), you should be in the office 5 days a week.  Try and argue against it.  Most of the time, the people that say they're more productive at home either don't get along with the other employees or think they're a little too important.
 

Canadian Federal Employee, circa 2026

Sean O’Reilly, president of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada, told The Canadian Press he finds the government's decision "insulting and disrespectful."

"I would like to say I was surprised but I'm not," said O'Reilly, who was made aware of the move less than an hour before the message went out to employees. "I'm really beside myself on just why the decision is being made now."

Sean's right, this decision should have been made years ago.

Sounds like Sean doesn't want to go back into the office every day.  I think it's insulting that public servants think they're entitled not to do a 5 day work week.  You can't really serve the public if you're hiding at home during business hours.  Another rule of thumb I came up with: if you can do your job from home, someone else can do that same job for cheaper.

"I don't know how this helps the Government of Canada. It doesn't save them money. This doesn't increase productivity," he said. "I don't see how this helps my members or how it helps the Canadian people."

Sean, you were probably quoted while you were "working from home" or a Zoom call where you got to wear pajama bottoms.  I don't see how what you just said helps your cause.  You just made it sound like the people that are hired are useless whether they're in or out of the office.  If bringing back these people to the office doesn't increase productivity, fire the work-from-home dead weight and hire some contentious people.  It's pretty simple.

Nathan Prier, president of the Canadian Association of Professional Employees, said the announcement demonstrates that the government has "both a willful disregard for reality and absolute contempt for its employees and taxpayers."

"As thousands of public servants are watching their jobs disappear and Canadians are watching health and other programs get gutted, this government is committing to making public servants less productive while wasting billions of dollars of taxpayer money," Prier said. "If workers needed another sign that this government can’t be trusted, this is it.”

While that's true the current government can't be trusted and/or expected to do anything right, Nathan's arguments don't make any sense.  Wasting billions of taxpayer dollars would be keeping on people that don't want to work.  I'm a taxpayer and because of my current day job, I know exactly what WFH people are like.  I'm not thrilled that Sheila gets paid a good buck to do her laundry, prep for dinner and binge watch Netflix in the background while she's supposed to be "working from home".  That's called a waste of money, or for you savvy, business-minded people, it's called a poor ROI.

I found the "willful disregard for reality" a bit ironic.  The reality is there's no need to work from home any more.  There's no "emergency" and there's no valid excuse why there's still work from home.

The union said the decision comes on the heels of a recent ruling by the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board that telework can be negotiated at the bargaining table.

Well, that was a foolish ruling to make.  They should have thought ahead.

Sharon DeSousa, national president of the Public Service Alliance of Canada, said the four-day in-office mandate announced by the federal government is "a slap in the face" to all federal public service workers.

Well, Sharon, to the public, it's a slap in the face that it's not 5 days.  Sharon seems to have that "willful disregard for reality" that Nathan was talking about. 

"Prime Minister Carney has made it clear where his priorities lie, and they aren’t with workers," DeSousa said.

Sharon, we all knew that before the election.  He's too self-centred to care about other people and/or do a good job.  His "deal" with China is a perfect example of that.  But that doesn't matter, everyone should have been back to 5 days a week years ago.  Let go of the past and stop having that willful disregard for reality.  That goes for you too, Nathan and Sean.  Grow up and get back to work.