Showing posts with label Amazon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amazon. Show all posts

Friday, November 18, 2016

Technical Misery or Rhino Just Being Rhino



If you talk to kids born after 1990, they think vinyl is cool.  Old-timers will refer to something called "The Vinyl Experience" that kids also think is cool.  "The Vinyl Experience" is the "ritual" (I've seen that word used) for physically holding the record, looking at the cover, taking the record out of the sleeve, putting it on the turn table and then some kind of aural nirvana is reached.  That takes about 5 - 7 seconds but apparently it's an experience.

Let me tell you about my latest vinyl experience:
Last week, I ordered Black Sabbath's Technical Ecstasy with white coloured vinyl from Amazon.  I cringed when I saw it was made by Rhino Records but it was the “cheapest” of all the coloured Black Sabbath records so I thought, "why not?".

The record came in damaged, so thanks to Amazon for their piss-poor shipping practices on that one.  How poor?  Have a look at the picture.  Some genius at Amazon thought that shipping a record in an oversized box with mini air bags thrown in there should be sufficient.  And here's how the record turned out.  Surprise.  They may as well slapped an address label and a stamp on the album and thrown it in the mail.



Getting back to the experience, I take the cellophane off and pull out the album from the damaged sleeve.  The white vinyl sure does look cool.  I put the album on the platter, close the dustcover and hit Start.  Surprise, the song skips.  Hmmm... it also sounds kind of wonky, not unlike being on a boat.  Stop.  Open the lid.  Ah, the record's warped; about an inch high on one quadrant.  Have a look at the picture.



I didn't listen to the rest.  I put the warped album back in the damaged cover and put on the CD since I was in the mood for listening to the songs.

That was my latest vinyl experience.  

Why the experience was so poor was because I purchased a record made by Rhino Records.  I have more botched "new" vinyl from Rhino than any other company in my record collection.  And I'm blaming Rhino because their name is on the label.  Frankly, I don't care who they contract it out to.  Rhino should give up making vinyl because they honestly don't know how to do it properly. Vinyl is a record companies' last kick at the can to stay around a little bit longer.  If I saw the end coming, I’d be making an effort not to keep producing garbage.  I have other things to spend $25 on than a piece of garbage from Rhino when I can go to the dumpster for free.

Don't get me wrong, I've purchased enough "new" vinyl from other companies and I'm completely convinced that anyone that currently manufactures vinyl LPs is completely incompetent and useless at their job.  It's just that Rhino vinyl is consistently poor.  I take that back, Rhino is exceptionally good at making poor quality LPs.  And to charge double the price for an album compared to a flawless CD is criminal.

What's also adds to the frustration is that a stack of records I found in my parents' basement (I forgot to take them when I moved out).  Even though they smell a little musty, the old records still play all the way through and are excellent compared current reissues made from 180 Scam Vinyl.  And I didn't get that distracting little voice in my head that says "don't enjoy it too much because it'll skip somewhere" like I do when I'm listening to a Rhino record.

After this latest "vinyl experience", I even cancelled my (at the time) pre-ordered Rolling Stones in Mono vinyl box set and I ordered the CDs instead (excellent, by the way).  I don’t know if my nerves could take 16 albums that may or may not play.  Now that I think of it, I don't think I'll be buying a "new" record again.  Just because I have a little bit of disposable income lately doesn't mean I have to throw it away.

So you kids that think vinyl is cool, you should have been around when you could listen to a record all the way through.  Man, those were the days.

Thursday, March 13, 2014

The Best of Wasting Time


You know, maybe I'm not supposed to have what I thought would be my next CD released.
Here's a bit of history and it might make sense at the end of this why I'm getting a little bit frustrated with setting up this new CD.  In 2007, I put out "Will Work For Money - the Best of the 4-track Years".  That's the pic with the burgundy background.  So, that was 7 years ago.  Now, for continuity reasons, I'm calling the new Best of "Will Work For More Money - the Best of the 24-track Years" because all the songs were done on a 24-track recorder.  Pretty original, eh?  More tracks, more money.  Fun.  That's the pic with the blue background.
 
Pretty straight-forward.  Or so I thought.
After spending more time than I originally wanted to on making the new Best Of CD, it seems I'm having troubles getting this thing released.
The first road block was my test pressings from IndiePool.  They send two test copies, one with a glossy finish and one with a matte finish which is pretty cool except when I put the first one on, I noticed some distortions and drop outs.  At first I thought the master I sent in was defective.  I put the other CD on and there were distortions and drop-outs too - but in different spots.  In short, I still don't have a physical CD yet.
In the meantime, I thought I'd upload the wavs to CD Baby and upload the cover so I don't lose my UPC code since they give you a month to send in the physical CDs or you lose it.
Apparently, my cover isn't suitable.  Keep in mind, that's the blue background one.
Here's the first e-mail I got:
Hey Gregg,
I'm sitting here looking at Will Work for More Money and noticed something that may delay it getting sent to our digital partners like iTunes, Amazon, Spotify, etc.
-Upselling - Your artwork has extra information about you as an artist, or about another product, which is called "upselling" and is not allowed. Artwork cannot be used as a promotional tool & must be dedicated to the album/single it represents. Examples of this are listing your twitter page, website, or phrases like "Buy our new album" or "New album coming soon!", etc. For more information, please click HERE
Please log into your CD Baby members account HERE to make changes. If you have any questions, please feel free to email cdbaby@cdbaby.com.
Sincerely,The Digital Inspector
If it's because I put the ".com" on the cover, and that's really reaching, and a pretty gay reason since I already have a cover with a ".com" on it.  So I replied:
Hi,
I looked through the bullet points of what wouldn't be acceptable.  Is it because it looks a lot like a previous CD (http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/koval7 ) or is it just because there's a ".com" on the cover?  I don't mind making the change; just wondering.
Thanks,Gregg
 
In the meantime, I replaced the cover with this pic:
 
So I made up a label to go over top of the what I thought was the offending ".com".  The label has the CD title.  That's the title, "Will Work For More Money - The Best of the 24-track Years".  A label with the CD title.
Yesterday, I got a reply (I didn't get until this morning):
Hi Gregg,
Thanks for checking in!
So our digital partners do not allow references to other submissions/albums to be on cover art -- they consider this "upselling." That said, we need you to remove the text "the best of the 24-track years" from your cover art. This seems like a reference to another submission/album. That said, I have pulled down your submission "Will Work for More Money" from cdbaby.com and reset the uploader so you can replace the artwork.
I didn't write back saying "thanks for the inconvenience" or "why yes, it does refer to another CD, like my first Best of" but that didn't answer my two questions: Is it because it looks like a cover I already did or is it because of the faded .com and it looks like an URL?
I get pretty livid at stupidity.  Just throwing that out there.  I haven't replied back because one should never reply to an e-mail in anger but who wouldn't be pissed?  I'm angry that, 1, I had to censor my cover in the first place, and 2, I'm extremely pissed that now I can't have the CD title on the cover?  
Maybe I'll have a plain background, just my name, and I'll give it a title of "Take A Guess At What This CD is Called?"
This entry will be updated soon because I'm sure there'll be more annoying things to come out of this.